Intervention Type
Small Group
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Moderate ★★☆
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.25
# of Studies
1
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Black
Hispanic
White

SIPPS® (Systematic Instruction in Phonological Awareness, Phonics, and Sight Words) Program Description

SIPPS® is reading curriculum used for both new and struggling readers in grades K–12. The program has explicit routines focused on building skills on phonological awareness, spelling-sounds, and sight words. Each level of SIPPS® corresponds to a specific stage of reading development. Students are pretested, then placed at their points of need within a level and a lesson to best help them meet their individual reading goals.

Student population

SIPPS® was examined with 570 first and second grade students from multiple schools in an urban district in Florida. Nearly 75% of students were identified as economically disadvantaged, 50% were White, and 32% Hispanic. Also, a notable proportion were eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals.

Current evidence

SIPPS® has been rated as Moderate by Evidence for ESSA (https://www.evidenceforessa.org/program/sipps-systematic-instruction-in-phonological-awareness-phonics-and-sight-words-2/) for students in grades 1st-2nd. A study examining the effectiveness of SIPPS found significantly higher scores on the DIBELS compared to control groups. The program demonstrated an average effect size of +0.25.

For more information:

Website: https://www.collaborativeclassroom.org/programs/sipps/

SEG Measurement. (2022). Evaluating the effects of the SIPPS program. Newtown, PA: Author.

 

Skill
Multiple
Program
Intervention Type
1-1 Tutoring
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Strong ★★★
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.19
# of Studies
1
Population
Struggling Readers
English Language Learners
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Hispanic
Time: Minutes per Day
20-30
Time: Days per Week
5

Literacy First - UT Austin

Program Description

Literacy First is an early literacy intervention program focused on students in kindergarten through grade 2. The program identifies students reading below grade level and provides tutoring throughout the school year. Tutors work with their students daily in 30 minute sessions that are tailored to address specific individual literacy/language needs across students. Literacy First uses a response-to-intervention model that involves frequent benchmark assessments and weekly progress monitoring.

Student Population

A study focused on grades K-2 within 22 elementary schools in the Austin Independent School District and 630 students. The sample represented Hispanic, and English Learner populations, with 83% of students being eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals. The study was conducted in urban schools.

Current Evidence

Literacy First has been rated as "Strong" by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/literacy-first-ut-austin/). A study found significant positive effects on ITBS reading assessments, with an average effect size of +0.19, indicating improved reading outcomes compared to control groups.

For more information:

Literacy First

Phone: 512-232-2286

Email: support.literacyfirst@austin.utexas.edu

Website: literacyfirst.org

Caverly, S. & Stoker, G. (2021). Literacy First: Evaluation summary report. American Institute for Research.

 

Skill
Multiple
Program
Intervention Type
Individual
Small Group
Whole Class (Curriculum)
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Strong ★★★
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.14
# of Studies
1
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Black
Hispanic
White
Time: Minutes per Day
90

Journeys

Program Description

Journeys, developed by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, is a comprehensive K-6 reading and language arts program, evaluated for effectiveness in grades K-2. The program includes structured whole-group and small-group activities, focusing on vocabulary, phonics, comprehension, and fluency. Teachers engage students with a daily "big idea" and "essential question," integrating read-alouds and targeted skill development. The program includes a 5-6 hour initial training with follow-up support.

Student Population

Journeys has been studied with 1,046 students in grades K-2, representing African American, Hispanic, White, and English Learner populations, with many eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals. The study was conducted in suburban and urban schools.

Current Evidence

Journeys has been rated as "Strong" by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/journeys/). A study found significant positive effects on ITBS reading assessments, with an average effect size of +0.14, indicating improved reading outcomes compared to control groups.

For more information:

Provider: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

 Phone: 1-800-225-5425

 Email: k12inquiries@hmhco.com

 Website: HMH Journeys

Resendez, M. & Azin, M. (2012). A study of the effects of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s Journeys program: Year 1 final report. PRES Associates, Inc.

 

Skill
Multiple
Program
Intervention Type
Small Group
Technology-based Instruction Assistance
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Moderate ★★☆
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.06
# of Studies
1
Population
Struggling Readers
English Language Learners
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Black
White
Time: Span
20-40 minutes per week

iStation ISIP

Program Description

Istation’s Indicators of Progress (ISIP) Early Reading and ISIP Advanced Reading are computer-adaptive assessment programs designed to monitor student progress and guide instruction in reading. These assessments are delivered online and adjust in real-time to a student’s performance, providing immediate data on reading abilities. The programs assess a range of literacy skills including phonemic awareness, vocabulary, comprehension, and fluency. ISIP assessments are typically administered monthly and offer teachers detailed reports to inform instruction and intervention strategies.

Student Population

ISIP Early Reading and ISIP Advanced Reading have been evaluated with a large and diverse sample of students in grades 3-5. The study included 13,096 students across multiple schools and districts. Among participants, 72% were economically disadvantaged, 55% identified as Hispanic, 20% as White, and 17% as Black. The study was conducted in a mix of urban and suburban settings.

Current Evidence

Istation’s ISIP Early Reading and ISIP Advanced Reading programs have been rated as “Strong” by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/istation-isip-early-reading-and-isip-advanced-reading-assessments/). A large-scale randomized controlled trial found that students using ISIP scored significantly higher on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (effect size = +0.22). The positive outcomes in reading achievement support the program’s designation as having strong evidence of effectiveness.

For more information:

Istation

Phone: 866-883-7323

Website: https://amiralearning.com/istation-to-amira

Cook, M. A., & Ross, S. M. (2021). Evaluation of Istation’s Early Reading Assessment and Curriculum in Spartanburg County School District 7. Towson, MD: Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University.

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
Multiple
Intervention Type
1-1 Tutoring
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Strong ★★★
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.18
# of Studies
1
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Black
Hispanic
White
Other
Time: Days per Week
2–5

Chapter One (Formerly Innovations for Learning High Impact Tutoring)

Program Description

Chapter One is a personalized, one-on-one tutoring program designed to improve early reading skills through short, targeted sessions each week. The program integrates part-time tutors into classrooms to provide individualized instruction using a digital platform. Sessions typically last 5-10 minutes and focus on phonics development, reading fluency, and segmentation. The program uses technology to track progress and adjust instruction based on student needs. Tutors meet regularly with teachers to discuss student advancement.

Student Population

The Chapter One program has been studied with students in kindergarten, with 1,009 participants. The demographic breakdown included students from diverse backgrounds, including Black (72%), Hispanic (21%), and students eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals (56%). The study took place across rural, suburban, and urban communities.

Current Evidence

Chapter One has been rated as "Strong" by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/chapter-one-formerly-innovations-for-learning-high-impact-tutoring/). Two randomized studies showed positive impacts on reading achievement. In the first study, kindergarten students in Title I schools outperformed peers on the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment (effect size = +0.18). The second study also showed significant improvements in reading (effect size = +0.23) on the ORF and District Reading Level assessments, qualifying the program for a "Strong" rating.

For more information:

Chapter One

Phone: 800-975-3452

Website: chapterone.org

Cortes, K., Kortecamp, K., Loeb, S., & Robinson, C. (2023). A scalable approach to high-impact tutoring for young readers: results of a randomized controlled trial. National Support Student Accelerator.

Skill
Multiple
Intervention Type
Individual
Technology-based Instruction Assistance
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Promising ★☆☆
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.18
# of Studies
1
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Black
Hispanic

Imagine Learning & Literacy

Program Description

Imagine Language & Literacy is a digital education program developed by Imagine Learning, targeting literacy skills for students in kindergarten through second grade. It offers individualized instruction in areas such as phonological awareness, phonics, vocabulary, comprehension, and grammar. The program adapts to each student's learning pace, providing interactive activities designed to enhance engagement and learning outcomes.

Student Population

The study encompassed students in kindergarten through second grade, capturing a diverse demographic across the participating schools. Detailed demographic information, including race/ethnicity and gender distribution, was collected to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the program's impact across different student groups. Demographics included African American, Hispanic, English Learners, and students that qualified for Free and Reduced Price Meals.

Current Evidence

The study employed a correlational design to examine the relationship between student program usage and academic achievement outcomes(https://www.imaginelearning.com/products/ela/language-and-literacy/) . The results are promising. In Kindergarten they found increased usage of the program was associated with higher scores in letter naming fluency. In Grade 1 they found a positive correlation was observed between program usage and nonsense word fluency, indicating improvements in decoding skills. In Grade 2 they found a higher program usage was linked to better oral reading fluency, reflecting enhanced reading proficiency.

For More Information

https://www.imaginelearning.com/products/ela/language-and-literacy/

Powell, S. R., Cantrell, S. C., & Correll, P. K. (2020). Study of Imagine Language & Literacy in Grades K-2. National Comprehensive Center. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603421.pdf

 

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
Multiple
Intervention Type
Individual
Technology-based Instruction Assistance
WWC
Year: WWC
2006
Rating: WWC
+31
# of Studies
2
Population
English Language Learners
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Hispanic
Time: Minutes per Day
100
Time: Days per Week
5
Time: Span
4-8 weeks

Fast ForWord Program

Program Description

Fast ForWord is a computer-based supplemental reading program designed to improve students’ literacy skills. The program adapts to each learner’s pace, utilizing engaging graphics and interactive exercises to reinforce reading concepts. Through individualized instruction, students work on building foundational reading abilities while earning rewards based on content completion. Fast ForWord aims to enhance reading proficiency through structured, technology-driven practice.

Student Population

A study on Fast ForWord was conducted in rural Tennessee with fifth and sixth-grade students. The participant group primarily consisted of White students, including those eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals, indicating a diverse socio-economic background.

Current Evidence

Fast ForWord has been rated as “Promising” by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/fast-forword-elementary-whole-class/). A study evaluating the program’s impact found that students using Fast ForWord demonstrated higher scores on the state Terra Nova assessments compared to a control group. The reported effect size was +0.25, meeting the criteria for the ESSA “Promising” evidence category.

For More Information

https://www.scilearn.com/

Marion, G. (2004). An examination of the relationship between students’ use of Fast ForWord reading program and their performance on standardized assessments in elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University.

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
English Language Arts Achievement
Program
Intervention Type
Individual
Small Group
Technology-based Instruction Assistance
WWC
Year: WWC
2010
Rating: WWC
+17
# of Studies
8
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Time: Minutes per Day
30-100
Time: Days per Week
5
Time: Span
4 to 16 weeks

Fast ForWord Program

Program Description

Fast ForWord is a computer-based supplemental reading program designed to improve students’ literacy skills. The program adapts to each learner’s pace, utilizing engaging graphics and interactive exercises to reinforce reading concepts. Through individualized instruction, students work on building foundational reading abilities while earning rewards based on content completion. Fast ForWord aims to enhance reading proficiency through structured, technology-driven practice.

Student Population

A study on Fast ForWord was conducted in rural Tennessee with fifth and sixth-grade students. The participant group primarily consisted of White students, including those eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals, indicating a diverse socio-economic background.

Current Evidence

Fast ForWord has been rated as “Promising” by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/fast-forword-elementary-whole-class/). A study evaluating the program’s impact found that students using Fast ForWord demonstrated higher scores on the state Terra Nova assessments compared to a control group. The reported effect size was +0.25, meeting the criteria for the ESSA “Promising” evidence category.

For More Information

https://www.scilearn.com/

Marion, G. (2004). An examination of the relationship between students’ use of Fast ForWord reading program and their performance on standardized assessments in elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University.

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
Reading Fluency
Program
Intervention Type
Individual
Small Group
WWC
Year: WWC
2010
Rating: WWC
+8
# of Studies
8
Population
All Ability Levels
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Time: Minutes per Day
30-100
Time: Days per Week
5
Time: Span
4 to 16 weeks

Fast ForWord Program

Program Description

Fast ForWord is a computer-based supplemental reading program designed to improve students’ literacy skills. The program adapts to each learner’s pace, utilizing engaging graphics and interactive exercises to reinforce reading concepts. Through individualized instruction, students work on building foundational reading abilities while earning rewards based on content completion. Fast ForWord aims to enhance reading proficiency through structured, technology-driven practice.

Student Population

A study on Fast ForWord was conducted in rural Tennessee with fifth and sixth-grade students. The participant group primarily consisted of White students, including those eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals, indicating a diverse socio-economic background.

Current Evidence

Fast ForWord has been rated as “Promising” by Evidence for ESSA (https://evidenceforessa.org/program/fast-forword-elementary-whole-class/). A study evaluating the program’s impact found that students using Fast ForWord demonstrated higher scores on the state Terra Nova assessments compared to a control group. The reported effect size was +0.25, meeting the criteria for the ESSA “Promising” evidence category.

For More Information

https://www.scilearn.com/

Marion, G. (2004). An examination of the relationship between students’ use of Fast ForWord reading program and their performance on standardized assessments in elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University.

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
Comprehension
Program
Intervention Type
1-1 Tutoring
Technology-based Instruction Assistance
ESSA
Rating: ESSA
Strong ★★★
Year: ESSA
2023
Average Effect Size: ESSA
+0.64
# of Studies
1
Population
Struggling Readers
Grade
Race / Ethnicity
White
Time: Minutes per Day
20-25
Time: Days per Week
5
Time: Span
7 months

Amira

Program Description 

Amira is an AI-driven reading assistant designed to support students in grades K-5. The program uses a combination of digital assessments, individualized tutoring, and progress monitoring to enhance reading skills. Amira listens to students read aloud, analyzes their oral reading fluency performance in real-time, and provides instant feedback and instructional guidance. The program also includes professional development and training for educators.

Student population

Amira has been examined in grades 1-4. Participants were from a suburban and affluent school district, with 90% of the student body white, 8% black, fewer than 1% Hispanic, and only 10% eligible for free or reduced lunch; 178 students (92%) completed the study. Of these 178 students, 55 were identified by the teacher as special needs students.

Current evidence

Amira has been rated as Promising by Evidence for ESSA for students in grades K-5 (https://www.evidenceforessa.org/program/amira/). The program has shown positive effects on reading achievement. Students who used Amira performed significantly higher on the Total Reading Composite scores from the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test compared to the control group (ES = +0.64).

For more information

Amira Learning

https://www.evidenceforessa.org/program/amira/

Mostow, J., Nelson-Taylor, J., & Beck, J. E. (2013). Computer-guided oral reading versus independent practice: Comparison of sustained silent reading to an automated reading tutor that listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 249–276.

 

Intervention
🖳
Skill
Multiple
Program